Subject	NytWolf is spot on!
Posted by	Zarcasm(Hfd, CT) on March 29, 2010 at 10:05 PM
	This message has been viewed 67 times.
In Reply To	With $200 difference, I'd do 60k, here's why ... posted by NytWolf on March 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM
Message	The object is to replace parts that have deteriorated. The pulleys deteriorate with usage, not with age. Save your money for the real problems. I've recently had the same dilemma and opted to replace the pulleys at 90K. I also replaced the seals and in so doing punctured the A/C condenser = $300 fix!! No need to blow your wad right now and don't fix what ain't broken! It's not worth the risk. Zarcasm(Hfd, CT) view My Technical posts (click here) view My General posts (click here)
Follow Ups	60k or 120k kit - twin3037 19:37:03 03/27/10 I'd do 120k - SimaYi 19:49:03 03/27/10 Id do 120K just get it done all at once and over with (n/m) - idrivefast 20:16:00 03/27/10 120k (n/m) - turtleboy 22:04:14 03/27/10 120K, no question, here's why... - tdogzjoint 10:50:43 03/28/10 a bad idler pulley can destroy the engine just as a bad - ali300zx 11:00:02 03/28/10 With $200 difference, I'd do 60k, here's why ... - NytWolf 12:13:36 03/29/10 NytWolf is spot on! - Zarcasm(Hfd, CT) 22:05:28 03/29/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.